Of An Open Letter To The Richest One Percent


I Would Like To Speak
Directly To Bushtard's Base
Richest One Percent

The Ones Who Got Huge
Tax Cuts, The Corporations
That Don't Pay Taxes

The Ones Who So Far
Made No Sacrifices But
Reaped All The Rewards

The Ones Who Don't Have
Family Serving In Iraq
But You Are Pro War

All The Way Baby
All The Way To The Bank, Your
Profits Are Soaring

While Bush, Your Hero
Cut Soldiers Combat Pay And
Veterans Benefits

While Our Pentagon
Denies That Uranium
Is Killing Soldiers

Yes You, Oil Vampires
The Winners Of The Iraq War
The Exxon Execs

The Energy Meetings
You Had With Cheney Sure Look
Like They All Paid Off

H.M.O. Owners
Who Literally Drain All
The Life From People

Sending People To
Financial Ruin, Or Death
Just Out Of Your Way

Defense Contractors
Blackwater, Halliburton
The War Profiteers





You Make Us Weaker
Our Outsourced Military
A Colossal Waste

What In The Hell Do
You Think You Are Turning This
Great Country In To?

Your Tacid Support
Of The Bush Admin Is So
Truly Disgusting

In Just Seven Years
We Have Deficits As Far
As The Eye Can See

Military Is
Depleted, Recruitment Way
Down, Demoralized

Catastrophes At
Home Are Neglected, Ignored
Death By Thousand Cuts

Iraq War Is Lost
Impossible Position
Neocon Quagmire

And To Top It Off
Ahole Cheney Wants More War
With Iran ASAP

Real Estate Shell Game
Republican Ideas
Subprime Disaster

Every Time In Our
History, Republicans
Gain Too Much Power

Our Country Is Placed
On The Brink Of Disaster
Unsustainable

You Cannot Be This
Stupid, To Allow It All
To Go Down The Drain









Are You Planning On
Moving To Paraguay With
The Bushtard Or What

And Just Let This All
Fall Apart, Do You Want A
Strong America

I Have To Wonder
Do You Have A Conscience Or
Is Cash Your True God

You Got Yours, So Screw
Everyone Else, Is That Your
Basic Logic Here

America Has
Thirty Six Million Living
In Poverty

Lack Of Healthcare Is
Crippling Our Economy
Cannot Justify

The So Called Richest
Country Is Improperly
Named, It Should Be Called

The Richest Country
Of Greedy One Percenters
Who Plundered It All

You Installed George Bush
To Drain The Treasury And
Fill Your Big Pockets

Hypocritical
Republican Insanity
Is Unbearable

The Environment
Has Been Decimated And
We Cannot Ignore

I Suppose That My
Final Question To You Is
WILL YOU STOP YOUR GREED

Can You Stop Your Greed
Will You Stop Your Greed, Can You
Stop Your Greed Right Now



Anup Shah, Poverty Facts and Stats, GlobalIssues.org, Last updated: Friday, November 24, 2006

By the Numbers Income, Wealth, Executive Compensation, Wages, Data Banks




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • 8/29/2007 3:45 PM buzzflash.net wrote:
    Republicans have once again brought the United States full circle to the brink of disaster, almost exactly where it was in 1928 during the Great Republican Depression. Wealth has been concentrated in to the richest one percent and we hear Bush demanding more tax cuts for the wealthy. It's right wing insanity and greed at it's finest.
Comments

  • 8/29/2007 4:19 PM Fordman wrote:
    Interesting that the lowest figures on this Graph were attained during the time Republicans were in the White House. The most sustained sharp increase seems to have been during the Clinton years. Hmmmm obviously a Republican plot.
    Reply to this
    1. 8/29/2007 4:34 PM 575 wrote:
      Republicans are responsible for the current and former crisis. Your opinion of a chart does not change that.
      Reply to this
    2. 8/30/2007 2:55 PM sailorman wrote:
      The point is not that income migrates to the top based what party holds the White House.

      This graph is more useful to see the results of economic policy in general.

      During the period with the lowest figures, did liberal or "conservative" economic policy prevail?

      The conditions represented by this graph arguably do more to illustrate the impact of Congress than the influence of a particular President.

      Note the period between roughly 1940 and 1980. Liberal economic policies dominated during that period, regardless of who held the W.H.

      Liberals in Congress then would be labeled Socialists now. 1950 Republicans would be branded economic liberals today.

      Coincidentally, the middle class was created during this period, America was nearly universally recognized as the world leader in nearly every respect, and ALL boats, not just the yachts, were being lifted, (if you were white, anyway, but that's a different issue).

      When the oil cartels inflicted their punishment on our economy and humiliated Carter, the scene was set.

      Enter the "Reagan Revolution" and, more importantly, a radical rightwing Congress. Under the influence of the "greed is good" crowd, the mogul funded think-tanks, the newly put upon working class rednecks and the religious nutcases, the entire political paradigm careened to the right. Tax, labor, trade, environmental and social welfare policy; everything.

      The result of this macro economic upheaval, not who was President, is what this graph reflects.

      The Clinton period was illustrative of what republicanism had degenerated to by that time. The rightwing economic infection had done it's damage by then. Congress was far more conservative, (even the Dems), and it would have taken one hell of a more liberal president than Clinton to level the graph.

      The "dot-com" revolution also had a part to play in the "spike" during Clinton's term.

      In the last 13 years, productivity has increased 30%. 80% of the population has seen almost none of that reflected in their incomes. What does that tell you? 80% of the people aren't working hard enough?
      Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 11:33 AM ben wrote:
    The article nailed it 110% The PUTRID REPUBLICAN RATS HAVE RUINED OUR COUNTRY.
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 12:06 PM John wrote:
    nice letter...although we all know that most liberals are closet republicans...they are just too afraid to admit it. embrace the goodness that flows within you and come out as a republican.
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 1:28 PM Loyalis wrote:
    Let's see....
    without the 'richest' 1% there would be virtually no jobs for everyone else. Why? Because they are the ones that took chances and opened businesses and are rewarded for their success. It's called capitalism and it's awesome.

    Studies have shown time and time again that the richest people in America are mostly made up of first generation success. Capitalism tends to redistribute wealth over time, not socialism.

    You repeatedly criticize the military but I've found that almost all of the people I know currently serving are staunch Bush fans...

    Capitalism is not greed and being poor does not grant righteousness.

    I do commend you on your haiku structure though. You are able to convey a lot of information with them, however misguided.
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 1:34 PM Dan Mitchell wrote:
    I may be mistaken, but I believe Carter was in office at the lowesest point. I may also be mistaken, but I also believe he was a Democrat. However, with history being an unstudied field of endevour for most repugents, I forgive you for makeing such a sophamore mistake.
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 1:35 PM Kim Forbes-Gayton wrote:
    I couldn't have said it better myself. My question is: How much more will we take and what WILL it take to finally stop the madness before we all go over the brink?
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 2:07 PM Bill Tabb wrote:
    Huey Long, the much meligned populist governor of Louisiana had words of his own for the 1% -
    "Now what can this one man do with what is intended for ninety-nine? He cannot eat the food that is intended for ninety-nine people; he cannot wear the clothes that are intended for ninety-nine people; he cannot live in ninety-nine houses at the same time; but like the dog in the manger, he can put himself on the load of hay and he can say:

    'This food and these clothes and these houses are mine, and while I cannot use them, my greed can only be satisfied by keeping anybody else from having them.' " Huey Long Biography

    As Huey said: "Every Man's a King, No Man Wears a Crown"
    Reply to this
    1. 8/30/2007 2:19 PM angry_diane wrote:
      I think you have hit the nail on the head - its fits!!
      Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 2:17 PM angry_diane wrote:
    Why is anyone surprised by these statistics? And WHY do the rightees ALWAYS bring up Clinton - no matter what the subject, his name is always thrown out there. He was no angel, but I will take him ANY DAY over the corrupt administration we have now.
    IMPEACH
    Reply to this
  • 8/30/2007 3:08 PM Dave from queens wrote:
    Republican class warfare has been destroying the fabric of America since 1968. It really picked up in the 1980s and under Bush, the Gilded Age, Hooveristic consequences of raw crony capitalism and class warfare has put tens of millions of middle class Americans who were once financially comfortable 1 paycheck or 1 health care catastrophe from bankruptcy.
    Reply to this
  • 9/5/2007 2:10 PM Mia wrote:
    This is one of the times in our history, what has to us, we are so morally corrupt we fall for the BushCo..bs and watch like the rest of the world see us continue to ignore our own...Katrina shouldn't still be the issue it is. What is wrong here.
    Reply to this
  • 6/16/2009 7:14 AM Dubai Property wrote:
    Well one thing i can say for sure and i think i speak for most people in general.Is George w Bush is a complete PRAT!!!!!
    Reply to this
  • 6/17/2009 2:22 AM Lake District Accommodation wrote:
    I couldn't agree more with what has been stated in the above comments.Very useful knowledge thanks again.
    Reply to this
  • 6/17/2009 2:47 AM Bournemouth Hotels wrote:
    Some of the comments on George w Bush has put a big smile on my face.I dont no if there intended to be funny but they sure do make me laugh.
    Reply to this
  • 6/25/2009 2:56 AM Sell and rent back wrote:
    I no its a dog eat dog world but seemed when Bush was in the white house,He was doing all the eating with such greed and intent.Thank god he's out of there now!But can Obama turn it all around?This is the question!!!!
    Reply to this
  • 6/30/2009 12:49 AM Life Insurance wrote:
    How are bonus and fractional shares treated for income tax purposes?
    Reply to this
  • 7/1/2009 5:31 AM Trairler Insurance wrote:
    "Life Insurance and Mediclaim are like left and right hand of an individual. Today no one knows what will happen in your life when you are leaving from the home for office or even I say if you are in your home. Today the cost of hospitalisation is so huge that a medium income group person can not afford hospitalisation expenses. So Mediclaim Policy is must for an individual.
    Reply to this
  • 7/2/2009 1:20 AM Income protection wrote:
    Nice stuff.This is one of the times in our history, what has to us, we are so morally corrupt we fall for the BushCo..bs and watch like the rest of the world see us continue to ignore our own.
    Reply to this
  • 8/6/2009 1:24 AM Commercial Mortgage wrote:
    The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (also known as ERTA or the Kemp-Roth Tax Cut) was “A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to encourage economic growth through reductions in individual income tax rates, the expensing of depreciable property, incentives for small businesses, and incentives for savings, and for other purpose.
    Reply to this
  • 8/11/2009 2:02 AM Vehicle Conversation wrote:
    Fantastic post with some great issues being brought up i have to reiterate on some of the above comments i dont no if there intended to be humorous but what is being stated about G,W,Bush is so true what an absolute idiot he was.He was all about the greed and oil.
    Reply to this
  • 8/12/2009 4:15 AM UK Removal Companies wrote:
    Great stuff.I haven't laughed so much in ages.
    Reply to this
  • 8/12/2009 6:53 AM Tyre Recycling wrote:
    Nice one.
    Reply to this
  • 8/13/2009 4:56 AM Log Cabins wrote:
    Well it says something when most of the comments on this site are slating George.W.Bush it speaks for its self.
    Reply to this
  • 8/14/2009 12:49 AM Steam Showers wrote:
    Fantastic post.
    Reply to this
  • 9/17/2009 8:21 AM Lease Extension wrote:
    Haiku is a form of Japanese poetry, consisting of 17 moras (or on), in three metrical phrases of 5, 7, and 5 moras respectively. Haiku typically contain a kigo, or seasonal reference, and a kireji or verbal caesura. In Japanese, haiku are traditionally printed in a single vertical line, while haiku in English usually appear in three lines, to parallel the three metrical phrases of Japanese haiku. Previously called hokku, haiku was given its current name by the Japanese writer Masaoka Shiki at the end of the 19th century.
    Reply to this
  • 10/5/2009 1:38 AM Search Engine Optimisation wrote:
    This post is great, it has helped me a lot.
    Search Engine Optimisation
    Reply to this
  • 10/5/2009 5:07 AM Compare Life insurance wrote:
    This as been a great help.
    Compare Life insurance
    Reply to this
  • 10/5/2009 6:40 AM Search Engine Optimisation wrote:
    Very well presented blog.
    Search Engine Optimisation
    Reply to this
  • 11/7/2009 5:13 AM cleaner reviews wrote:
    Thanks for sharing.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2009 3:05 AM Internet marketing company wrote:
    Great response I shall be researching this topic further.
    online marketing company
    Reply to this
  • 12/12/2009 9:53 AM international removals wrote:
    Very interesting!
    Reply to this
  • 1/5/2010 1:41 AM website design los angeles wrote:
    Examining your all blog, I’ve come to the decision that being a part of online blogging community provides you with an awesome opportunity to gain more knowledge in various spheres.
    Reply to this
  • 1/8/2010 3:49 AM Dentist Melbourne wrote:
    You are very very creative in your writings.
    Reply to this
  • 2/3/2010 9:06 AM Buenos Aires travel guide wrote:
    Now we can say that it's perfectly clear,
    Reply to this
  • 6/15/2010 7:18 AM movers and packers wrote:
    'This food and these clothes and these houses are mine, and while I cannot use them, my greed can only be satisfied by keeping anybody else from having them.'
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.